ColorBlind™

Hello ColorBlind™ Enthusiasts,

We are ready to sprinkle a bit of scholarly insight mixed with a dash of humor into your day. Today, we're diving into the vibrant world of Black history and culture. Let's embark on this enlightening journey with four enthralling topics, and then delve into each one with the zest and zeal they deserve!

🌟👊🏾🌟 Help us get to 10,000 subscribers. 🌟👊🏾🌟

1. Justice Samuel Alito: A Controversial Jurist

Justice Samuel Alito, appointed to the Supreme Court in 2006 by President George W. Bush, has been a polarizing figure. Known for his conservative stance, Alito has made rulings and written opinions that have sparked significant debate. Critics argue that his decisions often reflect a lack of consideration for racial justice, raising concerns about their implications for African American communities. This article examines key cases to understand the potential impact of his judicial philosophy on racial equality in the United States.

2. Voting Rights and Shelby County v. Holder

One of the most contentious decisions in which Justice Alito played a crucial role was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). The ruling effectively dismantled key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which protected African American voters in states with histories of discrimination. By arguing that the conditions that warranted such protections no longer existed, Alito and the majority undermined efforts to prevent voter suppression. The aftermath has seen a resurgence in laws that disproportionately affect African American voters, such as stricter ID requirements and reduced voting locations.

3. Affirmative Action and Fisher v. University of Texas

Justice Alito has consistently voiced opposition to affirmative action, as evidenced in his dissent in Fisher v. University of Texas (2016). He argued that considering race in university admissions was unfair and unconstitutional. Alito's stance overlooks the historical and systemic disadvantages faced by African American students, threatening programs designed to promote diversity and equal opportunities in higher education. His opinions in such cases contribute to ongoing debates about race-conscious policies and their role in addressing racial inequities.

4. Criminal Justice and Racial Bias

Alito's record on criminal justice issues also raises concerns. In cases like Utah v. Strieff (2016), Alito's majority opinion weakened protections against unlawful police stops, a practice that disproportionately targets African Americans. Critics argue that such decisions exacerbate racial profiling and the over-policing of Black communities. By often siding with law enforcement, Alito's rulings can perpetuate systemic biases within the criminal justice system, leading to unequal treatment and outcomes for African Americans.

Want more ColorBlind™?

Look out for newsletters for history enthusiasts, activists, collectors and historians! Don’t forget to tell a friend.

If your company is interested in reaching an audience of founders, executives, marketing professionals, IBOs, museums, galleries, bespoke professionals, entrepreneurs, consultants, curators, agency professionals, decision-makers, communications teams, education professionals, students, academics, innovators, and thought leaders advertising opportunities are coming soon.

If you have any comments or feedback, just respond to this email!

Thanks for reading,
Cedric

Thank you for reading this edition of ColorBlind™ brought to you by The Montague Collection. Stay tuned to our next issue!